The conflict that leads to movement and development must be based on an impersonal principle. It is the moving society that contains within it at least two opposing fronts, where each front calls for a kind of principles contrary to what the other front calls for. In this way, the "cake of tradition" is broken. The community then takes action.
If you see a conflict between two opposing fronts in a society, know that these two fronts are like the feet you walk.
It is worth mentioning that the social movement is not free from harm despite its apparent advantages. There is nothing in the universe that is all good or evil. The social movement helps people to adapt without a doubt. But at the same time cost the community a high price. As it is a risk and progress towards the unknown. It leads to anxiety, scrambling and extravagance in many things. A person who lives in a mobile society can not get the peace of mind that a human gets in a stagnant society. He faces every day a problem. And hardly ends up until another problem is brewed. He is in constant rest only when he dies. He does not know what to face after death from the
9Apps 4.9
